Logo Background RSS

Traffic Light Sensors - A Day Late and a Dollar Short

  • Written by Joseph DeCarloJoseph DeCarlo 6 Comments6 Comments Comments
    Last Updated: December 2, 2008

    This blog post was originally going to be about my frustration with and the danger of traffic signals that operate on sensors.  It is very annoying when trying to obey traffic laws, you are ignored by traffic signals.  In times when traffic is light or non-existent, you will have to run the light because it will never change for you.  This is a very dangerous scenario!  We all know, there is an inherent danger to running red lights in motor vehicles.  At least in that case, the vehicle is easy to see.  Run that same light on a bicycle, and your chances of being seen decrease dramatically.

    This brings me to the second part of my post - the “A Day Late and a Dollar Short” part.  As I was riding around town on Black Friday, I got caught by a traffic light that wouldn’t change for me.  There were no cars and no crosswalk button that I could push to encourage the light to change to green.  My choices were to wait a very long time for a car to meander down this secluded side street,  turn around and abandon my trip, or attempt to run this red light with as much precaution and safety as you can get when breaking the law.  This made me realize that though bicyclist have as much right to the road as motorized vehicles, the roads were not designed with bicyclists in mind.

    First I started researching how traffic lights that change based on vehicle presence worked.  I found that there are three basic types:  Ones that use lasers, ones that use air hoses, and ones that use inductance.  If you’ve seen the “pressure plates” at stop lights that look like your vehicle tire must be on them to work, then you’ve actually seen the inductive loop sensors.  Those pressure plate looking things are not actually pressure sensors, but are cuts in the asphalt to insert a coil of wire used in inductive loops.  I am not going to butcher the explanation, because I barely understand it myself.  There is a good explanation of it here.  Let’s just say that inductive loops provide a electromagnetic field which is interrupted by large metal objects (cars, trucks, etc.).  Bikes do not have enough inductive material to interrupt that electromagnetic field.  During my research, I found several products that were created for bicyclist to solve this problem.

    GreenLight has two products (one an improvement over the other) that promises bikes will “Stop Getting Stuck at Red Lights!”  Here is their explanation of how their product works, but the abbreviated version is they have small metal magnet that  you place on your bike that will interfere with the electromagnetic field at intersections, “fooling” the computer into thinking your bike is a large metal object, thus triggering the light to turn green.  At $24.95 with an unconditional 30-day money back guarantee, it is probably worth a try.

    If you are not wanting to buy a product, Instructables.com has a DIY version that involves epoxying a magnet to the bottom of your bike shoe.  Comments to the blog post indicate it works and suggest other alternatives.

    Personally, I don’t run into this problem very often in Atlanta.  I happened upon it Friday, because I was biking around town in Columbus, GA.  If you are running into this problem often, try one of these solutions and let us know how it went.

    And there you have it.

    - Joe.

    VN:F [1.0.5_294]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  1. #1 k brown
    December 2, 2008 am31 11:19 am

    Motorcyclists sometimes need to use a magnet too. Nothing special about the magnet.

    VA:F [1.0.5_294]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    Post ReplyPost Reply
  2. #2 Joseph DeCarlo
    December 2, 2008 am31 11:23 am

    Kevin,

    I am assuming this is Kevin Brown, anyway. That’s what I hear. Greenlight says their product is modeled after the motorcycle products.

    - Joe.

    VN:F [1.0.5_294]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    Post ReplyPost Reply
  3. #3 Thomas Daugharty
    December 4, 2008 am31 8:10 am

    This blog entry reminds me of how much work is left to make roads actually usable by cyclist and motorist alike. We need lanes and signals that just work.

    Road Rage from a cage is no fun but I see their point. The roads are just not setup for both of us so in the meantime it’s do what I must to ride. As for the OP I like the DIY magnet. Great idea!

    VA:F [1.0.5_294]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    Post ReplyPost Reply
  4. #4 Joseph DeCarlo
    December 4, 2008 am31 9:58 am

    Tom,

    I don’t think we will ever get there, especially in rural communities. The money and, let’s face it, the priority just isn’t present. I would love to see more dedicated lanes or alternative routes, such as trails, available for cyclists. Since we don’t have those, I would love to see motorist get more educated about sharing the roads with cyclists.
    Just having more cyclists on the roads will at least get motorists used to seeing us. The more comfortable motorists are with sharing the road, the less likely accidents will happen.
    Fortunately, the majority of car/bike accidents are the fault of cyclists. That is fortunate, because it means cyclists have control over themselves and, therefore, have control over reducing their chances of being involved in an incident.
    Wow… this was almost another blog posting!

    -Joe.

    VN:F [1.0.5_294]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    Post ReplyPost Reply
  5. #5 Thomas Daugharty
    December 4, 2008 am31 2:17 pm

    “the majority of car/bike accidents are the fault of cyclists” .. Squirrel Riders! ;) Mandatory roller training for all.

    Point of this is tracking the white line is all we really have as a means of sharing the road. Unless we can figure out a way to keep up with cars in a 45mph zone someone is always going to be upset because they can’t pass.

    I think if “share the road” is the message then we need a safe path in a designated lane. F-250’s have really wide mirrors and it’s just a matter of time before I get nailed by one.

    VA:F [1.0.5_294]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    Post ReplyPost Reply
  6. #6 Joseph DeCarlo
    December 4, 2008 am31 2:51 pm

    That is the reason for the “Keep to the right, but not too far” category in Rules of the Road post. If you are so far to the right that the F-250 thinks it can pass you without changing lanes, you are too far to the right.

    VN:F [1.0.5_294]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    Post ReplyPost Reply
Leave a Comment

Clicky Web Analytics